← Back to all posts

AI is getting more expensive → become a better user

by Elena Jäger
May 23, 2026
Connect

⏱️ Read time: ~4 min

Something shifted recently and I'm hearing about it everywhere in my community.

Claude has introduced usage limits and is raising its prices. Hit your limit? You can't continue working unless you buy extra credits. Full stop. And of course, it always happens to me when I am deeply immersed in a task.

Langdock, the AI workspace I run pretty much everything through, has followed suit with limits of their own. The difference: when you hit your Langdock limit, you're not completely stuck but you get downgraded to ChatGPT 5.2 until your limit resets. And ChatGPT 5.2 is not great. So you end up buying more credits anyway.

Sound familiar?

Here's the thing: I'm not actually surprised by any of this. And I don't think you should be either.

This is the app store moment.

Cast your mind back to the early days of the App Store. Most apps were free. The ones that cost anything were a dollar, maybe two. It felt almost too good to be true.

It was.

The strategy was simple: get you hooked first, worry about making money later. And it worked. Now try finding a genuinely useful free app. You can't. Subscriptions, in-app purchases, premium tiers — it's everywhere.

AI is following exactly the same playbook. The early subscriptions were priced below break-even on purpose. The goal was adoption. And it worked brilliantly. Because honestly, can you imagine doing your work without AI now? Can you imagine not asking ChatGPT for everyday life stuff? I can't.

We're locked in. And now that we are, the prices are going up. This was always going to happen.

So the question isn't "why is this happening?" The question is: what do you do about it?

Me? I rethought my AI setup

My answer was to get even more intentional about how I use these tools, starting with my own setup.

Let me give you an example: I was running Claude Sonnet 4.6 as my default inside Langdock, and frequently switching to Opus 4.7 for heavier work. Both are exceptional models. Opus especially is extraordinary for complex thinking, strategy, planning...

But Opus is also resource-heavy. And I was reaching for it out of habit, not necessity.

So I made a change. I switched my default model to Claude Haiku 4.5.

Haiku is faster, lighter, and more efficient. For most of what I do day-to-day: drafting, summarizing, quick research, generating options — most of the time, it delivery exactly what I need.

Now I intentionally switch to Sonnet or Opus when the task actually calls for it. Complex strategy. Nuanced client communication. Deep analysis. That's when the heavy models earn their place.

The result? Fewer "limit reached" moments, more deliberate usage, and honestly, my outputs haven't suffered at all.

The real issue isn't the price. It's the habit.

Most of us opened a Claude or ChatGPT account, started experimenting, and never stopped to ask: am I actually using this well?

AI tools reward intentionality. The clearer you are about what you want before you open the tool, the less back-and-forth you need. Fewer exchanges = fewer credits burned = better results.

Three shifts that make a real difference:

1. Match the model to the task. Not every task needs your most powerful model. Save the heavy hitters for work that genuinely needs them.

2. Prompt with intent, not hope. Vague prompts produce vague outputs — and three rounds of corrections. One clear, well-structured prompt does the job in one go. This is a skill. It's learnable.

3. Know what you're opening the tool for. Before you open your AI tool, know the outcome you want. "I'll just see what it comes up with" is the fastest way to burn credits and feel disappointed.

Key Takeaway

AI is becoming a skill you pay for twice, once with money, once with your attention. The coaches and consultants who get the most out of it aren't the ones spending the most. They're the ones who've taken the time to learn how to use it well.

That gap between using AI and using AI well is only going to matter more as prices rise.

Have fun experimenting,

Elena

 

P.S. Have you hit a usage limit yet? And when you did, did you feel like you were getting your money's worth? Hit reply and let me know. I have a feeling the answers will be interesting.

Does The AI Race Have a Finish Line?
🕓 Read Time: ~3.5 min   For a long time, ChatGPT was the tool. Everyone had a license, everyone was using it, and it felt like the obvious choice. Then Gemini and Claude came along and put ChatGPT to a test. Then Claude seemed to just take over in most categories. Better models, better features, Claude Code, Skills, Artifacts, Cowork before anyone else was doing it. A lot of people, myself...
Work slop is real. And it's getting embarrassing.
⏱️ Read Time: ~ 2 min This week I want to share something fun with you. Fun, yet totally relevant for each and everyone of us. The internet is full of terrible content. Things that sound good but make absolutely no sense at all. And it seems to be getting worse. Last week, I received two unsolicited messages that made me laugh out loud and then made me a little sad for the people who sent them....
AI is Wasting Your Time.
    ⏱️ Read time: ~2 - 3 min This week's edition might sting a little... Join me for a short experiment? You won't regret it! Ready? Let's go: Scroll through LinkedIn for five minutes right now. I'll wait. AI workflows. Automation stacks. "I built this in Claude Code in 47 minutes." Founders proudly showing off systems that run their entire business while they sleep. It looks impressive...

Not signed up yet?
Do it right here:

© 2026 Future of Work
Privacy Policy Home

JOIN THE VIP LIST

Name of Free Resource

Get started today before this once in a lifetime opportunity expires. Get started today before this once in a lifetime opportunity expires.