← Back to all posts

AI is getting more expensive → become a better user

by Elena Jäger
May 23, 2026
Connect

⏱️ Read time: ~4 min

Something shifted recently and I'm hearing about it everywhere in my community.

Claude has introduced usage limits and is raising its prices. Hit your limit? You can't continue working unless you buy extra credits. Full stop. And of course, it always happens to me when I am deeply immersed in a task.

Langdock, the AI workspace I run pretty much everything through, has followed suit with limits of their own. The difference: when you hit your Langdock limit, you're not completely stuck but you get downgraded to ChatGPT 5.2 until your limit resets. And ChatGPT 5.2 is not great. So you end up buying more credits anyway.

Sound familiar?

Here's the thing: I'm not actually surprised by any of this. And I don't think you should be either.

This is the app store moment.

Cast your mind back to the early days of the App Store. Most apps were free. The ones that cost anything were a dollar, maybe two. It felt almost too good to be true.

It was.

The strategy was simple: get you hooked first, worry about making money later. And it worked. Now try finding a genuinely useful free app. You can't. Subscriptions, in-app purchases, premium tiers — it's everywhere.

AI is following exactly the same playbook. The early subscriptions were priced below break-even on purpose. The goal was adoption. And it worked brilliantly. Because honestly, can you imagine doing your work without AI now? Can you imagine not asking ChatGPT for everyday life stuff? I can't.

We're locked in. And now that we are, the prices are going up. This was always going to happen.

So the question isn't "why is this happening?" The question is: what do you do about it?

Me? I rethought my AI setup

My answer was to get even more intentional about how I use these tools, starting with my own setup.

Let me give you an example: I was running Claude Sonnet 4.6 as my default inside Langdock, and frequently switching to Opus 4.7 for heavier work. Both are exceptional models. Opus especially is extraordinary for complex thinking, strategy, planning...

But Opus is also resource-heavy. And I was reaching for it out of habit, not necessity.

So I made a change. I switched my default model to Claude Haiku 4.5.

Haiku is faster, lighter, and more efficient. For most of what I do day-to-day: drafting, summarizing, quick research, generating options — most of the time, it delivery exactly what I need.

Now I intentionally switch to Sonnet or Opus when the task actually calls for it. Complex strategy. Nuanced client communication. Deep analysis. That's when the heavy models earn their place.

The result? Fewer "limit reached" moments, more deliberate usage, and honestly, my outputs haven't suffered at all.

The real issue isn't the price. It's the habit.

Most of us opened a Claude or ChatGPT account, started experimenting, and never stopped to ask: am I actually using this well?

AI tools reward intentionality. The clearer you are about what you want before you open the tool, the less back-and-forth you need. Fewer exchanges = fewer credits burned = better results.

Three shifts that make a real difference:

1. Match the model to the task. Not every task needs your most powerful model. Save the heavy hitters for work that genuinely needs them.

2. Prompt with intent, not hope. Vague prompts produce vague outputs — and three rounds of corrections. One clear, well-structured prompt does the job in one go. This is a skill. It's learnable.

3. Know what you're opening the tool for. Before you open your AI tool, know the outcome you want. "I'll just see what it comes up with" is the fastest way to burn credits and feel disappointed.

Key Takeaway

AI is becoming a skill you pay for twice, once with money, once with your attention. The coaches and consultants who get the most out of it aren't the ones spending the most. They're the ones who've taken the time to learn how to use it well.

That gap between using AI and using AI well is only going to matter more as prices rise.

Have fun experimenting,

Elena

 

P.S. Have you hit a usage limit yet? And when you did, did you feel like you were getting your money's worth? Hit reply and let me know. I have a feeling the answers will be interesting.

An AI investment that paid for itself in no time
⏱️ Read time: ~3 min I just spent $100 on Claude credits to rebuild my website. Before you think I'm reckless, hear me out. I didn't hire an agency. I didn't outsource to a freelancer. I used Opus 5 to audit my existing website and all landing pages (ca. 50, many I no longer use), my entire codebase, establish new coding standards, and design the architecture for a completely revamped site. The...
Why you're confused about which AI model to use
⏱️ Read time: ~4 min One of the most frequent questions I get from both my customers and prospective customers is about model choice: "How do I know which model to use?"  It's an understandable question. Six months ago the answer was more or less straightforward. Now there are countless serious models worth considering, and a new one seems to drop every week. Even people who use AI daily, pe...
EU AI Act: What You Need to Know About Disclosing AI-Generated Content
⏱️ Read time: 5 min This week warrants an extra edition because a significant part of the EU AI Act is now coming into force. I also want to be upfront: I'm not a legal expert on the EU AI Act. This is informational content only, not legal advice. The EU AI Act is complex and enforcement is evolving. When in doubt, consult a lawyer. This is also a longer edition than usual, but I think the stak...

Not signed up yet?
Do it right here:

© 2026 Future of Work
Privacy Policy Home

JOIN THE VIP LIST

Name of Free Resource

Get started today before this once in a lifetime opportunity expires. Get started today before this once in a lifetime opportunity expires.